Proposition 10 – California – November 4, 2008

Posted on 23 April 2009 under Alternative Fuel Vehicles by admin
centgov asked:


Proposition 10 – Bonds. Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Renewable Energy. Statute. Prop 10 Non-partisan info produced by videovoter.org cgs.org LA36.org.

Hot Wii Games

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

11 Responses to “Proposition 10 – California – November 4, 2008”

  1. cjcookie Says:

    Visit Our Store

    yes god bless her soul, but we have a fundamental difference regarding corporations so i dont think that we can come to a consensus on anything

  2. mahknones Says:

    Romance Books

    Tell your friends to Vote No on Prop 10- it’s a $10 billion ripoff that doesn’t clean our air.

  3. freddymedal Says:

    Visit Our Store

    Obamas Grandmother has died. God Bless her!!

    The CARB, headed by Alan Lloyd, caved to industry pressure and repealed the Zero Emmisions Vehicle mandate. Lloyd was given the directorship of the new fuel cell institute, creating an inherent conflict of interest. Footage shot in the meetings showed how he shut down the ZEV proponents while giving the car makers all the time they wanted to make their points.

    Corporations don’t usually do things without being forced to do so.

  4. cjcookie Says:

    Fun Games

    sure, but you can’t blame a government for not taking at initiative at a project that corporations and board of directors should have initiated

  5. freddymedal Says:

    Hot Wii Games

    Take a look at the price of computers compared to 5 or 10 years ago. They’re way more powerful and cheaper now. With most new technologies, we suffer Introductory pricing, like the 1st VCR’s, DVD players, HD Cameras and so on. There never was a chance for us to buy electric cars, and see those prices drop. Oil companies don’t want to lose their place in our wallets so they allowed Hybrids so we keep sippin gas. Chevron bought the battery Technology for the Electric car to kill the electric car.

  6. cjcookie Says:

    Mens Wear

    if you have enough money to actually afford an electric car over a gas one, then you are in the minority. Most “green” technologies are not viable because most of the american public cannot afford it. My parents own a hybrid soley based on the reason that it saves them gas over its the course of its life.

  7. WolfWinston Says:

    Mens Wear

    PG&E and SoCal Edison are against Prop 7, NOT Prop 10, fool.

  8. rawls3183 Says:

    Romance Books

    can you please elaborate.

  9. WolfWinston Says:

    Romance Books

    Sierra Club, League of Conservation Voters, Natural Resources Defense Council OPPOSE Prop 10

  10. freddymedal Says:

    Every thing you need for your own home bar

    I’ll vote yes. Anything PG&E or SoCal Edison is for….I’m against. The Oil companies won in CA in 2006, don’t let the utility companies win this time!

  11. freddymedal Says:

    Mens Wear

    What an absolute SHAME, California killed the electric car in 2003 on the same day we went to war with the country Iraq, which never attacked us. The creator of the battery for the elctric car said he had a more powerful battery, but the car makers did not want the battery, so they could say “Look, this car can’t be used because it gets 120 miles per charge. Could you imagine if they didn’t fight the electric car where we would be today??

    Solar power: Can we incorporate magnifying glasses??

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.